Trinity Creative
Buying domain names can be quite addictive. I hate when people buy them for no reason other than to sell them...good for them if a big company pays them a lot of money...shame on them if some individual or small group without a lot of money really could use that domain.
I think it's horrible that there's so much claimed "estate" on the internet that's completely vacant. It's such a waste. I don't even think people will make money selling some of these domain names. Think about it. I wanted trinitycreative (one word) but it doesn't exist. I also wanted a few other similar names that did exist but were for sale. Now, who's going to pay these morons for those names? Well I might...but how much? I wouldn't spend any more than $50-100 on the name. It's not worth it to me otherwise. I have www.trinity-creative.com. I'm not going to make any money off trinitycreative *edit: actually, it was trinitydesign.com *, I have a site for business already...
Let's say the person who registered a name I wanted or a name some garage band wants can only find people willing to spend $50 on the name. Was it really worth it? No. They'll be upset too because someone somewhere told them it was a good idea to be clever and get names. So they probably won't sell it and look dumb for not making much or actually losing money.
So the point to my rant here is this: Try not to register a domain name unless you intend to use it, or if it's really really good/clever and you think you would stand to make a lot of money...like the dude who sold the domain for the iphone. Yea, good deal there! Only in that case, I believe the guy was actually using the site legitimately!
I hear now if you aren't using the site legitimately, companies can push and force you to give it up. Is that true? I don't know. I think that's just as wrong as wasting good domain names.
Anyway, I registered Trinity Creative - www.trinity-creative.com and it will be my new site for showcasing new and experimental work. Why trinity? Photography, web design, and print design of course. It will host stuff that doesn't quite fit into my portfolio either because I don't feel it's strong enough or because it's too out there. It's also going to be for people I work with/for so I can transfer files, share things, etc. Of course I won't give up my flickr page, but I need more capabilities than what flickr offers. I will probably custom code this site too...which will be an experiment in itself. Now, when will I have the time to actually work on that site since I don't have time to update my blog?
*edit: Phew! I got just plain Trinity Creative too, wow, how did I miss that one?
Other Blogs 



Hi, Tom:
Best of luck with the domain. Don’t worry, I’m way out in New Jersey…won’t be your competitor any time soon. — Lily
I had to laugh when I saw your blog entry. See, last year this time I had to buy the www.TrinityCreative.com domain from some dude for $650 bucks because my bank mistakenly thought my email was @trinitycreative.com (no S!)… I had since corrected the email and no longer needed the domain, and that’s why it became available and you snatched it right up. No problem; I’m happy that you can make use of it. I just had to laugh because if I hadn’t spent the $ you would probably never had the chance to get it…I don’t see you or anybody else in this day and age paying $650 for a domain name (well, McD or Coke maybe). I totally agree with you–if you don’t need a domain name, don’t squat!
Comment by Lily Chen — September 14, 2007 @ 2:46 am
Oh no! That’s rough man. Yea, see, it’s exactly what I’m talking about. I have no clue what these companies do — where they get their money — or how they choose domain names. Maybe it wasn’t a domain farm (?) company either. You’re right, I’d never pay $650 for a domain name unless I was a selling a product where I could count it as an expense.
Anyway, I will put it to good use soon. Just swamped with work - and NJ isn’t too far away =) I’m in NYC and am originally from Pennsylvania. Thanks for posting! (ps - nice web site and portfolio!)
Comment by Tom — September 14, 2007 @ 7:47 am